The Orthodox Bishops with authority over California say it is "imperitive" that Propositon 8 passes and direct the faithful to vote for it. In case you are interested, +BENJAMIN is my bishop.
-----
ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN BISHOPS OF CALIFORNIA
in Support of Proposition 8:
A State Constitutional Amendment to Restore the Definition of Marriage
The decision of the California Supreme Court on May 15, 2008, unilaterally redefines the sacred institution of marriage in a manner unprecedented in human history — and alien to our Christian tradition. We, the Orthodox Christian bishops of California, were saddened by this decision which constitutes a direct attack upon the longstanding role and freedom of religion in American life. A majority of the justices declared not only that same-sex couplings must be allowed to exist at those couples' discretion as "marriages," but that the state of California is forbidden to refer to these couplings as anything but "marriages."
Orthodox Christianity holds in high regard the God-ordained institution of marriage and the family. The Orthodox Church must and shall remain true to its faith and tradition, and affirm that marriage is the union of one man and one woman, given by God to one another for salvation, mutual support, encouragement, love and the ability to bear children.
As members of the Church and as citizens of this great land, we cannot withdraw from the society in which we live. Our parishes and our faithful are called upon to be "salt and light," to paraphrase Christ, and as such, they engage with their neighbors in acts of charity and love. We will continue our charitable works, and our engagement with society — including to faithfully teach the truth about Christian principles of living.
The Orthodox Church in the United States thrives and grows, in many respects, because of the enduring principles upon which this great country was founded. Our definitions of basic institutions such as marriage, shaped by the unfathomable forces of love and nature coupled with the experience of all recorded human history, rightly derive from what the Founders of our country knew as the "natural law" of "nature and nature's God".
It is in this light that the Orthodox Christian bishops of California reject the decision of the California Supreme Court in In re Marriage Cases. The institution of marriage emanates from something transcending our passing political institutions, and cannot be unilaterally altered in this way. We therefore must act when that promulgation directly contradicts our faith — and threatens the very foundation of Orthodoxy's flourishing in America.
Therefore, we, the Orthodox bishops of California, call upon the faithful, as responsible and concerned citizens of California, to overturn this ruling by the California Supreme Court by voting in favor of Proposition 8 this coming November. This proposition is a regrettably necessary measure to restore the true definition of marriage in the eyes of our state. A state that believes same-sex couplings constitute "marriage" implicitly — and sooner or later, explicitly — denies the role of the Church and all faiths that adhere to traditional values in public life. Please exercise your citizenship and vote in November.
The passage of Proposition 8 is an imperative.
With Archpastoral Blessings,
+Metropolitan GERASIMOS - Greek Orthodox Metropolis of San Francisco
+Bishop JOSEPH - Diocese of Los Angeles and the West, Antiochian Archdiocese of North America
+Bishop MAXIM - Serbian Orthodox Diocese of Western America
+Bishop BENJAMIN - Orthodox Church in America, Diocese of the West
6 hours ago
6 comments:
The problem with this statement and many like it is that it merely asserts the Orthodox position without ever really explaining it. If only the bishops would produce a statement on sexuality/anthropology that places the teaching on marriage in an intelligible context rather than bald assertions.
I know--from personal experience--that at least two OCA hierarchs are themselves homosexual. If one of the goals of the bishops' statement is to carve out some kind of superior moral ground, it does not do so. If anything, the statement is incriminating.
Andrew, I agree that there was much more they could have said. But I think for Orthodox Christians, the appeal to Tradition by their bishop is enough. This letter was intended for an Orthodox audience. Obviously it wasn't intended as an argument that should be heeded by non-Orthodox.
Jim, this is not a gossip site. If you want to bring canonical charges against someone, do it the proper way.
Thank you both for reading my blog.
Matt,
Thanks for your reply. I am not so sure I agree, and I think this was a real missed opportunity to evangelize. The bishops threw their kamilavkas into the political ring and so they could/should have proclaimed the Gospel and the Orthodox understanding of sexuality and marriage and its relationship to homosexual marriage. To do less than make a presentation that is intelligible to the culture is, especially in this context, a missed opportunity that fails to help evangelize
orthodox whom are often less than clear about this as well as the culture.
hmmmm..a group of old white guys in robes..creepy
in regards to jim and andrews comments
i agree,and think that you should not hold office in a church that is against homosexuality.
side note-i dont hate gays
i love them just as much as i love anyone else.
Anonymous, you write like we know each other well. Are you one of my cousins?
Post a Comment